Marshall's translation is very reliable, his textual choice is as adequate as the other two available texts, and Marshall does a good job attempting to convey Greek verb tenses into English. Ignore those folks and their conspiracies. A few nincompoops think that the 'Textus Receptus' IS identical to the inspired autographa, and hence they hate anyone not exclusively using it (see the one-star reviewer below as an example of such wit). The interlinear tranlsations of these Greek texts provide you with the best available literal english translations of the New Testament. The three texts mentioned flow from different literary schools of thought, and all are of great value. Since none of these various texts can verifiably be labelled 'identical' with the original autographa, all three textual versions represent the best texts offered by the various shades of textual criticism (textual criticism: the manner in which an original document, either no longer extant or not currently available, can be deduced via literary techniques from the information that is available). An interlinear that uses the so-called 'Majority text' is the Farstad/Hodges interlinear. Interlinears that use the so-called 'Textus Receptus' include Green's interlinear and George Berry's. Marshall uses the so-called 'Critical text.' Other interlinears likewise use it, such as Paul McReynolds' and Brown/Comfort's. Alfred Marshall's interlinear is one of several available, and is of very high quality.

Interlinear Scriptures are very useful tools to have when involved in meticulous Bible study.

Greek interlinear bible nasb